MooWorld... thoughts on the go

Donald’s Deadly Ego

It is difficult not to see Donald Trump’s rush to execute an unprecedented number of death row inmates, before his toxic tenancy of the White House expires, as the ultimate emotional rush that feeds his ego.

Human Gullibility

Human beings are intrinsically gullible. Largely because they have evolved a desperate need for certainty. Of course little is certain, but humans feel better if they believe it to be. Variation within species means that the certainties human beings ascribe to are broad and can be stark, rendering a social world forever polarised.

Toxic society

It is certainly never appropriate, in any social context, to tar all protagonists with the same brush, and I do not. However, the burden of social malady at the macro level does weigh heavier on some societies than others. The UK has its fair share to be sure. But the toxicity of sociality in the United States has morphed, in very short order, from chronic to acute morbidity.

The Americanisation of UK popular culture has proved a pervasive and permanent UK import, but a pathology of politicalisation is poisoning the population across the pond. We surely don’t want that over here. Do we?


The Human Virus

I note that ‘Chris from Amsterdam’ remarks, that, mother Earth is telling us that we are the virus - and it has begun testing its latest vaccine against us.

A sobering thought.

Cancel culture

Morality is fickle. Shapeshifting across time and place, the dialectic of equity renders morality largely uncertain and particular. As with all things, morality is a process not a state; thesis and antithesis a necessary and productive perpetual process. Moral certainty is as unrealistic as it is dangerous.

Shedding our political skin

Aristotle was wrong. We are not political animals, we are fundamentally human animals. But political culture has undermined our virtues and exacerbated our vices. Ideology cannot account for biology; human sociality is not any political hue nor is it skin deep but in our genes. This is not to argue for one stance or the other but to point out that genuinely human sociality is obscured by politics and political visions of human belonging. We need to shed our political skin and try and think outside the box!

Contemporary adaptation

The human race’s cognitive and behavioural adaptation to cultural evolution stands in sharp contrast to the continued adaptive efficiency of other organisms, including those that cause a threat to human species survival; the current coronavirus challenge being the dominant current example.

The Darwinian notion of adaptations only necessarily ‘good enough’ to survive in a given environment is stark. The tension between variation as both an advantage and a stressor is in constant play in the human social/cultural world and makes for an anxious state of affairs. That adaptation to the challenges of cultural environments could be more successful, there is no doubt. Human cultural evolution at the macro species level is an ongoing toxic struggle to get beyond the ‘good enough’ to something ‘good for all’. Given that variation is inevitable in a process of evolution by selection then this may not be possible. The thought that such a state of affairs may be a forlorn aspiration is depressing.

Whether the human race will self-annialate as a consequence of its withering tribal maladies or be eradicated by evolving toxic organisms in the natural world is less certain than the likelyhood that one of them will eventually prevail.

Limitations of Objectivity

Reality is a person-specific phenomenon. In a sense, reality and consciousness are synonymous. Shared realities across a population are limited to common sensory experience. Human objectivity, then, is as subjective as the rest of the human world.

Trump

I have argued elsewhere (see The Limits of Political Belonging) for a kind of citizenship more human than political. But the advent of Donald Trump has highlighted the variation in humanness that can give rise to equally problematic partialities as those that political cultures provoke. Perhaps my next title should be "The Limits of Human Belonging"

The Guardian view on scrapping the Human Rights Act

To the Sun, on its front page on Thursday, it is simply “the hated Human Rights Act”. To this newspaper it is something quite different. The Human Rights Act is a source of pride. It is a civilised and a civilising law.